Frontrun

Share this post

How to steal $16 billion dollars

www.frontruncrypto.com

How to steal $16 billion dollars

How crypto bank FTX stole $16 billion dollars of depositor funds

John Cook
Nov 12, 2022
1
Share this post

How to steal $16 billion dollars

www.frontruncrypto.com

⚠️ Author’s note: You may notice archive.org links used throughout this guide. It is because the elites and invisible hands responsible for this diaster are actively trying to delete previously published FTX endorsements from the internet. Too bad the internet never forgets.

Dear frontrunners,

Take a moment and watch the 41-second clip below. It is Sam Bankman-Fried, a 30-year-old crypto billionaire and operator of an online crypto bank called “FTX”. In a 2022 congressional hearing, he is advocating for regulatory oversight to safeguard retail investors from crypto ponzi schemes….

Twitter avatar for @Fxhedgers
FXHedge @Fxhedgers
SAM BANKMAN-FRIED
11:11 PM ∙ Nov 9, 2022
762Likes136Retweets

…This same person advocating for regulatory oversight to safeguard the plebs is now being accused of using depositor funds in “bespoke non-reported transactions between financial counterparties”. Did he fool you? Don’t feel bad. He also fooled Blackrock, Forbes, Bloomberg, Sequoia Capital, The City of Miami, Tom Brady, Giselle Bundchen, The Ontario Pension Fund, and the entire Ethereum community, who rallied behind him as a modern-day JP Morgan.

Frontrun predicts the future of money and technology

Twitter avatar for @TomBrady
Tom Brady @TomBrady
Hey @giseleofficial @StephenCurry30 @Trevorlawrencee @MLB @kevinolearytv @LCSOfficial @MiamiHEAT @riotgames @TSM @stoolpresidente, you in? @FTX_Official #FTXyouin
4:00 PM ∙ Sep 8, 2021
29,386Likes4,402Retweets

If this is the last paragraph you read: let this be a reminder that the talking heads on TV are not infallible just because they have more money than you, have more followers than you, went to a better university than you did, won more Superbowls than you did, or work for an employer that is more prestigious than yours.

Greed begets greed and in this analysis, we outline how SBF lost $16 billion dollars in depositor funds and destroyed $4 billion in wealth via the collapse of the FTT token.

If you’re looking for a detailed recap of the on-chain events and tweets that transpired over the past week - I recommend you first read Bitcoin Pro’s recap or Bankless Nation. A good timeline of events can be found at “Web3 is going great” and Glassnode published a 28-minute youtube video capturing the contagion and stablecoin bank run in real-time.

Welcome to the party.

The TLDR is that Alameda Research used FTX depositor funds to facilitate bespoke, leveraged investments which ultimately went to zero. This is illegal. The link between Alameda and FTX is The CEO of FTX (Sam Bankman-Fried or SBF, for short) was the founder of Alameda Research.

Alameda Research

The initial source of contention wasn’t the co-mingling of FTX depositor funds, but rather the insolvency of Alameda Research via a leaked balance sheet shared by Coindesk. On November 2nd it was disclosed that Alameda Research had at least $7 billion in US-dollar-denominated liabilities offset by $14 billion in “assets”. The consensus and my theory are that the assets listed by Alameda are not worth $14 billion for 3 reasons:

  1. The FTT token is illiquid and trades at 50% of the fair market value marked to the FTX/USD order book.

  2. Alameda’s position in the FTT token represents between ~50% to 100% of the circulating supply.

  3. Other equities and crypto investments are in speculative penny tokens and alt-layer 1s like MAPS, OXY, FIDA, SIU and are not easily redeemable for US-denominated dollars at market value.

Share

My best guess based on all available data is Alameda’s balance sheet looks like this: $14 billion of “assets” against $8 billion of known debt and $6.9 billion of unknown debt. I doubt Alameda has $6.9 billion of retained earnings or equity on its balance sheet, it is best case an accumulated deficit. Something is wrong.

An incomplete Alameda Research balance sheet. Source: Coindesk

The leaked, incomplete balance sheet of Alameda Research has many red flags:

  1. There are $5.8 billion of FTT tokens and FTT collateralized tokens (assets borrowed by Alameda backed by FTT tokens). As of 6/30/22 only $3.2 billion of FTX tokens were in the circulating supply. This is highly sus.

How is it possible that Alameda Research owns $5.8 billion of FTX tokens when only $3.2 billion are in the public supply? The FTT token is controlled and managed by FTX, this means FTT tokens can be created out of thin air in what is called “an infinite money loop”:

The infinite money loop - a core tenant of ponzinomics
  • FTX pre-mines or “mints” 350,000,000 FTT tokens

    • Note: All of these tokens exist but are inaccessible to the general public

  • FTX releases a subset of the FTT tokens to the public supply

  • FTX transfers a subset of the FTT tokens to Alameda

    • this is the $5.8 billion of locked and collateralized FTT tokens noted on their balance sheet

  • Alameda uses the FTT tokens as collateral for US dollar-denominated loans

  • Alameda makes risky investments, wins some, loses some but mostly loses

  • FTX releases more FTT tokens and sells to Alameda at a discount

  • The cycle repeats

What makes this “infinite” is FTX’s ability to control the token supply via burning and buybacks. From the FTX website:

FTX’s policy on FTT token burning and buybacks. Source - FTX.com

When FTX needs to remove FTT tokens from circulation:

  • FTX buys back FTT tokens

  • Tokens are stored in the treasury

  • When FTX or Alameda needs to raise more capital, uncirculated FTT tokens are then re-released to the public via the infinite money loop

Share

An important point of distinction is when the FTT token is repurchased it is not “destroyed” from the public record. My prediction is that FTX throttled the total circulating supply of FTT tokens and used pre-mined and tokens-not-in-circulation as a backstop for Alameda Research. How else can we explain that Alameda’s position in FTT tokens is greater than the total supply in circulation?

Contrarians to this might argue that FTT tokens are “burned” and removed from circulation via an un-spendable address but there has been zero proof given to this theory and FTX has offered no proof-of-burn mechanism to corroborate their claim.

  1. Moreover, the aggregate value of all crypto-related assets is a reflection of highly illiquid, volatile, penny tokens.

  • The illiquidity of the FTT token and lack of revenue accruing to token holders implies a worthless token. That is $5.7 billion marked down to $0 (this is the position taken by Sequoia Capital).

  • “Locked Solana tokens” implies tokens that are out of circulation, a result of a pre-mine on a vesting schedule. That is $863 million marked down to $0.

  • “Other crypto tokens” reflect nascent web3 projects like MAPS, OXY and FIDA. These are highly illiquid penny tokens, and should be marked down to $0.

My assessment of the fair market value of all assets on Alameda’s balance sheet is ~$500 million, depicted below.

FTX

At this point, all that’s known is that Alameda has between $8 billion and $14 billion of debt backstopped by ~$400 million in real assets. The link to FTX bankrolling Alameda Research was exposed by Coinmetric’s Head of R&D Lucas Nuzzi, who noted that 173 million FTT tokens were activated around September 26th. Note this step 1 in the infinite money loop, creating new tokens from thin air.

Twitter avatar for @LucasNuzzi
Lucas Nuzzi @LucasNuzzi
1/ I found evidence that FTX might have provided a massive bailout for Alameda in Q2 which now came back to haunt them. 40 days ago, 173 million FTT tokens worth over 4B USD became active on-chain. A rabbit hole appeared 🧵👇
Image
11:22 PM ∙ Nov 8, 2022
12,974Likes3,685Retweets

That same day over $8 billion USD of FTT tokens were transferred on chain; the single largest move in the history of FTX.

Share

325 million FTT tokens worth $8 billion were transferred in a single day. Source: etherscan

Who was the recipient of the newly activated FTT tokens? Alameda Research. $4.1 billion of newly minted FTT tokens were sent to Alameda.

$4.1 billion transfer from FTX to Alameda Research. Source: etherscan

What’s so damning is the contract that released the 173 million FTT tokens is the same contract from the 2019 FTX ICO! Ouch.

FTX 2019 ICO smart contract - source: etherscan

It’s so obvious that Alameda and FTX are deeply interconnected despite the facade of independence previously portrayed by SBF. Alameda participated in the FTX ICO. So what does Alameda immediately do with the $4.1 billion of FTT tokens it received? Alameda posts FTT tokens back to FTX as collateral. We can’t make this up!

$4.1 billion was immediately transferred back to FTX from Alameda - source: etherscan

Share

Alameda auto-vested $4.1 billion of FTT by immediately sending the tokens back to FTT token creator. The 173 million FTT tokens are effectively used as collateral by Alameda as follows:

  • 173 million new FTT tokens were “activated” on 9/26

  • $8 billion dollars of FTT tokens were “moved” on 9/26

  • $4.1 billion dollars of FTT tokens were sent to Alameda Research on 9/26 11:57 AM UTC

  • $4.1 billion dollars of FTT tokens were sent from Alameda Research back to the deployer of the FTT token on 9/26 12:48PM UTC

    • This acts as the collateralization mechanism for the 173 million FTT tokens

    • and enables Alameda to claim $4.1 billion of assets on its balance sheet (the 173 million tokens)

…and once the 173 million FTT tokens are eligible for liquidation (via FTT’s token supply schedule), the deployer of the FTT token (controlled by someone at FTX) programmatically liquidates the position - the debt is paid off.

This is the infinite money loop.

Why would SBF do this?

My theory is that Alameda Research was wiped out during the most recent crypto winter, along with Luna, Celsius, BlockFi and others. It was only able to remain solvent via the 173 million FTT tokens received from FTX.

If Alameda imploded in the April to June timeframe, it would have been a terrible look given SBF’s aspiration for global dominance with a regulatory landscape controlled by FTX. We can see around this time FTX officials meeting US government regulators:

Twitter avatar for @collins_belton
Collins Belton @collins_belton
@GaryGensler @andrewrsorkin @SquawkCNBC Ideally you’ll spend some time to explain how, once again, the commission’s enforcement priorities focused on entities trying to deploy technology to prevent these market failures & asymmetries while you were meeting with the perpetrators or overlooking their malfeasance?
Image
12:42 PM ∙ Nov 10, 2022
690Likes137Retweets

How credible would the FTX team be in the eyes of Gary Gensler and the SEC if their proprietary trading firm went to zero? Would they have a seat at the table? The answer is no.

Share

What caused the bank run?

The interplay between FTX and Alameda, although illegal, would have turned out “ok” if a subsequent bank run on the FTT token didn’t ensue. The velocity of the collapse is impressive. I attribute it to 3 people and 5 tweets across 2 days:

Alameda’s CEO tweeting that the coindesk article is incomplete at best….

Twitter avatar for @carolinecapital
Caroline @carolinecapital
A few notes on the balance sheet info that has been circulating recently: - that specific balance sheet is for a subset of our corporate entities, we have > $10b of assets that aren’t reflected there
2:32 PM ∙ Nov 6, 2022
3,016Likes466Retweets

Binance’s CEO (who is FTX’s number 1 competitor) tweeting that he is liquidating his $2.1 billion FTT position…

Twitter avatar for @cz_binance
CZ 🔶 Binance @cz_binance
As part of Binance’s exit from FTX equity last year, Binance received roughly $2.1 billion USD equivalent in cash (BUSD and FTT). Due to recent revelations that have came to light, we have decided to liquidate any remaining FTT on our books. 1/4
3:47 PM ∙ Nov 6, 2022
23,686Likes4,997Retweets

Alameda’s CEO responding to Binance’s CEO offering a sale of FTT tokens at $22…

Twitter avatar for @carolinecapital
Caroline @carolinecapital
@cz_binance if you're looking to minimize the market impact on your FTT sales, Alameda will happily buy it all from you today at $22!
4:03 PM ∙ Nov 6, 2022
8,279Likes1,237Retweets

…only to have it declined by Binance…

Twitter avatar for @cz_binance
CZ 🔶 Binance @cz_binance
@tier10k I didn't say that. It was a question, not a commitment. I think we will stay in the free market. We still hold LUNA (now LUNC) today. 😂
7:35 PM ∙ Nov 7, 2022
2,580Likes752Retweets

At this point, SBF interjects by tweeting (and deleting) that “everything is ok” and depositor funds were safe…

Retail traders took note and fled to safety by liquidating their FTT positions, causing downward pressure from the token high of $68/token to $1.98/token as of this writing.

$8 billion dollars of ponzi wealth, destroyed.

https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/w_1456,c_limit,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fbucketeer-e05bbc84-baa3-437e-9518-adb32be77984.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F83a3da6b-dcc0-42ef-b659-fc6e4fe22683_2157x1033.png
Market cap and token price of FTT - source: Trading View

The only problem? Depositors are unable to withdraw their funds - FTX, including its US domicile, suspended withdrawals as a result of the ongoing liquidity crunch. FTX did not have enough capital to facilitate customer withdrawals because:

  • The initial loans provided to Alameda Research, collateralized in FTT tokens, were now subject to a liquidity crunch as a result of the declining FTT token price

  • FTX continued to backstop Alameda by using depositors’ funds but could not maintain pace with the downward pressure of the FTT token price

SBF eventually capitulated and acknowledged depositor funds were not safe and the trading platform was indeed leveraged…

Twitter avatar for @SBF_FTX
SBF @SBF_FTX
6) My sense before: Leverage: 0x USD liquidity ready to deliver: 24x average daily withdrawals Actual: Leverage: 1.7x Liquidity: 0.8x Sunday's withdrawals Because, of course, when it rains, it pours. We saw roughly $5b of withdrawals on Sunday--the largest by a huge margin.
2:13 PM ∙ Nov 10, 2022
3,773Likes355Retweets

…and unable to fulfill the persistent stablecoin outflows and declining FTT token price…

$932 million in FTX network outflows over a 7 day rolling window - source: Dune analytics

….FTX and its 134 subsidiaries filed for chapter 11 bankruptcy on Friday 11/11/22, but hey, at least SBF is really fucking sorry.

Twitter avatar for @SBF_FTX
SBF @SBF_FTX
1) I'm sorry. That's the biggest thing. I fucked up, and should have done better.
2:13 PM ∙ Nov 10, 2022
59,031Likes14,122Retweets

In closing.

The capital destruction of FTX ($8 billion) and loss of depositor funds ($16 billion) is a black eye for crypto and will result in government regulators demanding “more exchange oversight”, “comprehensive legislation”, and “regulatory clarity” to help protect retail investors. As open finance maximalists, we must reject the call for additional government oversight. The most appropriate response to the persistent destruction of wealth from centralized exchanges is self-custody and decentralized finance.

Would this happen on DeFi platforms like uniswap or AAVE? Could it happen? No. This is because of the permissionless nature of DeFi and the enforcement of counter-party risk via smart contracts.

  • If you traded crypto in Uniswap - you are safe

  • If you traded crypto in AAVE - you are safe

  • If you provided eth on a DeFi lending platform - you’re actually making a decent yield as a result of increased network demand

Now is the time to take custody of your crypto.

John Cook
San Francisco, CA
November 12th, 2022
www.frontruncrypto.com

Article cover generated by DALL-E - “An impressionist oil painting of medieval bankers set on fire by town authorities”


Frontrun predicts the future of money and technology. Support independent research for $10/month.


tweet of the week - “..and they call me a criminal” - Edward Snowden

Twitter avatar for @Snowden
Edward Snowden @Snowden
And they call *me* a criminal.
Twitter avatar for @ledgerstatus
Ledger 🇺🇸 Prometheus of the Plebs @ledgerstatus
Sam deleted these tweets? https://t.co/TZq5uezIgK
12:24 PM ∙ Nov 9, 2022
31,342Likes4,788Retweets

Share this post

How to steal $16 billion dollars

www.frontruncrypto.com
Previous
Next
Comments
TopNewCommunity

No posts

Ready for more?

© 2023 Frontrun
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start WritingGet the app
Substack is the home for great writing